

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lame Predictions From Mashable, And From SMJ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialmarketingjournal.com/2007/12/24/mashable-smj/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialmarketingjournal.com/2007/12/24/mashable-smj/</link>
	<description>Social Media Marketing Optimization Blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 00:42:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brick Marketing Admin</title>
		<link>http://socialmarketingjournal.com/2007/12/24/mashable-smj/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Brick Marketing Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 15:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmarketingjournal.com/2007/12/24/lame-predictions-from-mashable-and-from-smj/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Mark, thanks for the feedback. I just read an article on the RIAA that put it all into perspective for me and I think you&#039;re right. We may end up losing a couple of traditional music publishers in the next year or two. I knew online media publishers were outpacing traditional publishers, but what I didn&#039;t know was that the situation was that bleak. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, thanks for the feedback. I just read an article on the RIAA that put it all into perspective for me and I think you&#8217;re right. We may end up losing a couple of traditional music publishers in the next year or two. I knew online media publishers were outpacing traditional publishers, but what I didn&#8217;t know was that the situation was that bleak. <img src='http://socialmarketingjournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://socialmarketingjournal.com/2007/12/24/mashable-smj/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark "Rizzn" Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 23:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmarketingjournal.com/2007/12/24/lame-predictions-from-mashable-and-from-smj/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>EMI and Warner,if I had to pick.  They&#039;re all in trouble, though.

Read the hyperlinked section of that part of the article.  Radiohead netted twice as much money as the entire Warner label did last year.

Looking for a prominent Web 2.0 music seller?  How about Wal-Mart. Heard of iTunes?  What about Rhapsody or Yahoo on the second tier.

Any single one of those outsell most physical music sellers. If that&#039;s not dominance, I&#039;m not sure what is.

There are at least three prominent Facebook applications designed to allow you to share your library legally, as well.  Furthermore,  at least two major labels will be pulling financial support from the IFPI and the RIAA next year in an effort to stay profitable.

Things are changing, you just need to pay attention to the guideposts. Not paying attention to those guideposts is my definition of lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EMI and Warner,if I had to pick.  They&#8217;re all in trouble, though.</p>
<p>Read the hyperlinked section of that part of the article.  Radiohead netted twice as much money as the entire Warner label did last year.</p>
<p>Looking for a prominent Web 2.0 music seller?  How about Wal-Mart. Heard of iTunes?  What about Rhapsody or Yahoo on the second tier.</p>
<p>Any single one of those outsell most physical music sellers. If that&#8217;s not dominance, I&#8217;m not sure what is.</p>
<p>There are at least three prominent Facebook applications designed to allow you to share your library legally, as well.  Furthermore,  at least two major labels will be pulling financial support from the IFPI and the RIAA next year in an effort to stay profitable.</p>
<p>Things are changing, you just need to pay attention to the guideposts. Not paying attention to those guideposts is my definition of lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://socialmarketingjournal.com/2007/12/24/mashable-smj/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 22:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmarketingjournal.com/2007/12/24/lame-predictions-from-mashable-and-from-smj/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Ha, I&#039;ll pass your sentiments on to Mark. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, I&#8217;ll pass your sentiments on to Mark. <img src='http://socialmarketingjournal.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
